?>

Gingival labial recessions and the post-treatment proclination of mandibular incisors.

Written by on October 30, 2015

Eur J Orthod. 2015 Oct;37(5):508-13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju073. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Renkema AM(1), Navratilova Z(2), Mazurova K(2), Katsaros C(3), Fudalej PS(4).

Author information:

(1)*Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

(2)**Department of Orthodontics, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic and.

(3)***Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

(4)**Department of Orthodontics, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic and ***Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Piotr.Fudalej@zmk.unibe.ch.

INTRODUCTION: A prerequisite for development of gingival recession is the

presence of alveolar bone dehiscence. Proclination of mandibular incisors can

result in thinning of the alveolus and dehiscence formation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess an association between proclination of mandibular incisor

and development of gingival recession.

METHODS: One hundred and seventeen subjects who met the following inclusion

criteria were selected: 1. age 11-14 years at start of orthodontic treatment

(TS), 2. bonded retainer placed immediately after treatment (T0), 3. dental

casts and lateral cephalograms available pre-treatment (TS), post-treatment

(T0), and 5 years post-treatment (T5), and 4. post-treatment (T0) lower incisor

inclination (Inc_Incl) <95° or >100.5°. Two groups were formed: non-proclined (N

= 57; mean Inc_Incl = 90.8°) and proclined (N = 60; mean Inc_Incl = 105.2°).

Clinical crown heights of mandibular incisors and the presence of gingival

recession sites in this region were assessed on plaster models. Fisher’s exact

tests, t-tests, and regression models were computed for analysis of inter-group

differences.

RESULTS: The mean increase of clinical crown heights (from T0 to T5) of

mandibular incisors ranged from 0.75 to 0.83mm in the non-proclined and

proclined groups, respectively (P = 0.273). At T5, gingival recession sites were

present in 12.3% and 11.7% patients from the non-proclined and proclined groups,

respectively. The difference was also not significant (P = 0.851).

CONCLUSIONS: The proclination of mandibular incisors did not increase a risk of

development of gingival recession during five-year observation in comparison

non-proclined teeth.

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the

European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju073

PMID: 25481921 [Indexed for MEDLINE]