?>

Age-related changes of dental pulp tissue after experimental tooth movement in rats.

Written by on January 28, 2016

PeerJ. 2016 Jan 25;4:e1625. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1625. eCollection 2016.

Von Böhl M(1), Ren Y(2), Kuijpers-Jagtman AM(1), Fudalej PS(3), Maltha JC(1).

Author information:

(1)Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University

Nijmegen , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.

(2)Department of Orthodontics, University of Groningen, University Medical

Centre Groningen , Groningen, Griningen , The Netherlands.

(3)Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern,

Bern, Switzerland; Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dental Science,

Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

It is generally accepted that the effect of orthodontic tooth movement on the

dental pulp in adolescents is reversible and that it has no long-lasting effect

on pulpal physiology. However, it is not clear yet if the same conclusion is

also valid for adult subjects. Thus, in two groups of rats, aged 6 and 40 weeks

respectively, 3 molars at one side of the maxilla were moved together in a

mesial direction with a standardized orthodontic appliance delivering a force of

10 cN. The contralateral side served as a control. Parasagittal histological

sections were prepared after tooth movement for 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The

pulp tissue was characterized for the different groups, with special emphasis on

cell density, inflammatory cells, vascularity, and odontoblasts. Dimensions of

dentin and the pulpal horns was determined and related with the duration of

orthodontic force application and age ware evaluated. We found that neither in

young nor in adult rats, force application led to long-lasting or irreversible

changes in pulpal tissues. Dimensional variables showed significant age-related

changes. In conclusion, orthodontic tooth movement per se has no long-lasting or

irreversible effect on pulpal tissues, neither in the young nor in the adult

animals.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1625

PMCID: PMC4741077

PMID: 26855867

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare there are no competing

interests.